Sunday, April 06, 2008

Do we really need more proof that Islam is not a "religion of Peace?"

There has much written about the recent very public conversion of a "moderate" Muslim man to Catholicism.
Names are not important here. It could be anybody because the reaction from the "Religion of Peace" is always the same. "Death!!!!"
Yet no matter how times the Islamic world turns violently against the rest of the world, no matter how great the number of violent participants, our elected representatives insist on trying to convince us that it is a small number of Muslims that are violent.
Every major Islamic group has advocated the death of this convert.
No other religion uses such coercion to keep people from leaving. If Islam were actually a religion of peace, it would not have to use the threat of death to force conversion to Islam or to prevent people from leaving publicly. If Islam is a religion of peace, Bibles would not be illegal, subject to the death penalty. If Islam is peaceful, why do the "religious" police in Egypt and Saudi Arabia murder with impunity anyone they decide has broken Sharia law?
Why can fathers freely murder there daughters if they become rape victims, or are merely said to have seen alone with an unrelated male?
Islam presumes that all men are pigs and all woman are sluts. It seems to preach the Fraudian notion that we are driven only by sexual desire and are incapable of control this impulse. Therefore if a woman exposes any part of her skin she is trying to seduce a man away from his "purity in Islam." Soit is always the woman's fault if she is raped. An an Imam in Australia said regarding a string of gang rapes by Muslim men, "what do you expect a cat to do when you leave the meat uncovered?"

As an aside:
One must keep in mind also that Islamic law assigns one's religion based on the father. SO Barak Obama, under Islamic law is Muslim. When Obama claims he is not Muslim, that makes him an apostate and subject to the death penalty if he ever goes to a Muslim country. Will BO merely say he was compliant with Islamic law that allows lying a deceit to advance Islam because he had to lie to get elected? Why else would he spend 20 years in such a hateful "church" that is anything but Christian and has more in common with Farahkan's cult which the truly moderate Muslims reject as Not of Islam?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home